Peer Review Proces

BEAM employs a double-blind review process for each manuscript submission. For a detailed understanding, please refer to our Editorial and Publishing Cycle concerning our Peer-Review Policy.

No

BEAM Journal Review Steps

Description

1.

Journal Template Adherence

Manuscripts accepted for processing must adhere to the prescribed journal writing framework. Authors should consult the journal template for specifics.

2.

Journal checklists Compliance

Only articles that meet the journal's checklist criteria are accepted for processing.

3.

Two-Stage Review Process

The manuscript review process is bifurcated: an initial review by the Editor followed by a review by a designated Reviewer.

4.

Editor's Review

The Editor evaluates the manuscript's alignment with the journal template. Only those adhering to the template progress to the next stage.

5.

Plagiarism Scan

Post the Editor's review, manuscripts undergo a plagiarism scan. Only those that clear this stage proceed further.

6.

Reviewer's Evaluation

Manuscripts that pass the Editor's scrutiny are subsequently reviewed by two independent reviewers.

7.

Review Duration

Reviewers are allotted a maximum of 14 working days to evaluate a manuscript.

8.

Review Outcome

The decision is based on the comprehensive assessment by the reviewers.

9.

Revision Submission

Authors are given a maximum of seven days post-review to submit any required revisions.

10.

Revision Deadline Adherence

Revisions submitted post the stipulated seven-day window will be automatically declined.

11.

Originality Requirement

To maintain the journal's integrity, manuscripts must be original with a plagiarism rate of less than 20%.